Federated Learning with shrinkr15 days ago
Introduction | Use Case: Multi-Hospital Mortality Prediction | Scenario Setup | The Federated Network | The Clinical Model | $$\text{logit}(\text{mortality}) | Federated Workflow | Step 1: Each Site Fits Independently | Step 2: Sites Share Summaries with Coordinator | Path A: Share Full Posteriors (if permitted) | Path B: Share Only Summary Statistics (requires assumptions) | Central Coordinator: Stage 2 Shrinkage | Path A: Using Full Posteriors | Specify Network-Level Priors | Fit Hierarchical Model | Path B: Using Only Summary Statistics | Step 1: Check Normality Assumption | When CLT Fails: A Counter-Example | Step 2: Fit Using CLT Approximation | Compare Paths | Results: Improved Site-Specific Estimates | Visualize Shrinkage Effect | Quantify Uncertainty Reduction | Visualize Uncertainty Reduction | Clinical Impact: Network-Calibrated Predictions | Stage 1: Independent Site Predictions | Stage 2: Network-Calibrated Predictions | Visualize Prediction Changes | Privacy-Preserving Benefits | What Gets Shared | Compliance Benefits | Advanced Federated Scenarios | Scenario 1: Heterogeneous Models | Scenario 2: Meta-Analysis of Published Studies | Scenario 3: Iterative Federated Updates | Federated Learning Best Practices | 1. Establish Data Governance | 2. Standardize Stage 1 Models | 3. Verify Normality if Using Summaries | 4. Quality Control | 5. Sensitivity Analysis | 6. Transparent Reporting | Advantages of shrinkr for Federated Learning | When to Use Federated shrinkr | Summary | Additional Resources | Session Info
